Showing posts with label TV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TV. Show all posts

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Permanent rest stop for Drive

I knew it was too good to be true. The creative genius behind Angel, Firefly (no not Joss) and the little-known Wonderfalls, Tim Minear, has once again been left high and dry by Fox.

I anticipated Drive's premiere for months before it finally aired in a two-part season premiere on April 15th. It's ratings were not great but I held out hope that once it settled into its usual Monday night at 8 PM slot that things would improve.

Disappointingly, however, the ratings did not improve and after just 4 episodes, Fox cancelled the series. I enjoyed the four episodes and was hooked by the high speed chases in the mysterious, secret, illegal, cross country road race. And Nathan Fillion is hot.

The curious thing about Drive is not that it was cancelled, good well-written television is almost always replaced by inane reality TV these days, but that fans seemed to know from the beginning that it would be cancelled.

Reading postings at Whedonesque and TV Squad on April 16th revealed that fans were cautious about becoming too attached to the show. After Minear's experiences with Firefly and Wonderfalls InterplanetSarah even likened Tim and Fox's relationship to Charlie Brown and Lucy with the football. Like Lucy, Fox keeps pulling Tim's shows away at the last minute. To give Fox credit, though, they did a good job advertising Drive and, unlile Firefly, didn't premiere it on Friday night.

Much as I lament the loss of a show that I enjoyed (albeit briefly) I do wonder whether the networks made the only rational decision by cancelling a show with low ratings to avoid losing advertisers' dollars.

While I don't pretend to know how accurate Nielsen ratings are at predicting the actual viewership of a show, they do appear to be the only game in town. If the network execs are beholden to these ratings to determine which programs are revenue generating, then we shouldn't blame the network execs, but instead the Nielsen rating system for the loss of favorite shows.

Perhaps in addition to recruiting creative talent to write, direct and act in TV shows, we should also find additional ways to measure the viewership of these shows. We've seen that if Nielsen is to be believed, then the U.S. wants to watch trashy reality TV shows with no redeeming social value. This American TV consumer, at least, would rather turn the television off than watch the search for the next Pussy Cat Doll.

Thursday, January 11, 2007

My good friend, Interplanet Sarah, got me hooked on Firefly and Wonderfalls (all one season of them) and as a result, I can't wait for Drive to start. It's the latest Tim Minear show, yet like Firefly and Wonderfalls it seems destined for hardship before it even starts! According to TV Squad, Fox announced that Drive will begin March 1st in the 9 PM Thursday time slot recently vacated (thank God) by The OC.

Brett Love at TV Squad offers this analysis with which I completely agree:

"I continue to be baffled about the whole Minear/Fox relationship. It's a very Lucy with the football kind of thing. Here you go Tim, make another new show. This time we promise to support it, and give it a real shot. Really we do. Honest. And then right before the kickoff of the show.... whooops. Here's Tim on his back again.

"It would actually be a better idea for a sit-com than either of the two on their last
legs comedies that will be leading in to Drive. A vengeful programming executive is bent on tormenting a producer/writer so he hires him, and locks him into an exclusive deal, only to thwart his attempts at success at every turn. The big mystery is just what did our hapless producer/writer do to bring about such hatred. "

Seriously, folks, with the amount of crap on TV, can't you bump one of the mindless reality TV shows and schedule Drive in a timeslot other than the one currently occupied by Grey's Anatomy and CSI?

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Jingle Balls

Julia Ward at TV Squad reports on the latest assault on Christmas by... Charlie Sheen? Come on! I laughed, giggled and guffawed my way through last week's highly irreverent Two and a Half Men Christmas episode. I'm beginning to think that the American Family Association, the organization that has called for an apology from CBS, has no sense of humor.

In the action alert on the AFA's web site, they claim that "CBS and Sheen knew that the lyrics [to Sheen's revised Christmas carol] would greatly offend Christians, but did not hesitate to air them." Somehow, I seriously doubt that these lyrics

“Joy to the world, I’m getting laid; I’m getting laid tonight.
We’ll light the yule log, deck the halls, and then we’ll play some jingle balls.
It’s been a real long wait – this is our second date!
It’s Christmas Eve and I’m getting laid.”

were flagged by Standards and Practices as offensive to Christians... and I think that we all know from watching Studio 60 what Standards and Practices thinks will offend Christians.

If anything from that episode was questionable, it might have been the subplot of Jake, Charlie's ten-year-old nephew, getting wasted on eggnog and throwing up in the car on the way to Grandma's house. I mean, doesn't underage drinking pose a much greater threat to American Family Values than some re engineered Christmas carol!

I guess I don't understand American Family Values at all. If revising Christmas carols and relabeling "Christmas Sales" as "Holiday Sales" are what is really destroying the American family, I think I'll just hole up in the godless city of New York and spike all the minors' drinks at the next Holiday party.

And, for all you other irreverent family values destroyers, here are some alternative lyrics to favorite Christmas carols. Though they're most popular with the 8-10 demographic, I still find them highly amusing. Merry Christkwanzakuh! -Flygal

(to the tune of We Three Kings)

We three kings of Orient are
Smoking on a rubber cigar
It was loaded and exploded

We two kings of Orient are...

(to the tune of Joy to the World)

Joy to the World!
The teacher's dead
We barbecued her head!

What happened to her body?
We flushed it down the potty
And around and around it goes,
And around and around it goes,
And around and around and around it goes!

(to the tune of Deck the Halls)

Douse the halls with gasoline
Fa-la-la-la-la La-la-la-la
Light a match and watch it gleam
Fa-la-la-la-la La-la-la-la
Burn the school house down to ashes
Fa-la-la-la-la La-la-la-la
Aren't you glad you played with matches?
Fa-la-la-la-la La-la-la-la

Monday, December 04, 2006

Heroes: a mid-season entertainment and scientific analysis

The first half of the first season of Heroes has just completed. And I just have to say Wow! and Whew! Never have I been so riveted to a show waiting with baited breath as the talented actors, writers and director delivered high-quality, entertaining, thought-provoking shows from one week to the next.

Well never since I started watching Lost. But this post is about Heroes and will not dissolve into a whiny rant about how much better the first season of Lost was and how the writers have no idea where they're going... you can go to any of the TWOP Lost Forums for that...


I won't attempt to recap last night's episode, Erin over at TWOP has been doing a fine job with that, but just want to offer some commentary on what's known, unknown and the minor annoyances this show has brought me, as a geneticist.

Where we've been
Up to this point most of the episodes have focused the phrase, that I feel compelled to whisper every time I even think about watching an episode of Heroes, "Save the Cheerleader, Save the World!" It was totally creepy when Future-Hiro first announced it to a stunned Peter Petrelli in the frozen NYC subway. (For the record, Peter totally got the evil subway eye from Mohinder for spouting that "but didn't you see him? I mean time just STOPPED, and there way this guy with a sword" crap) And now? Peter has saved the cheerleader, but based on the last 5 minutes of last night's show, he's the bomb (or da bomb!). Which is odd since we've already met Radioactive man, Sprague, who melted his house and gave his wife cancer. Tim Kring has also stated in a TV Guide Interview that "we'll posit another theory that [the nuclear bomb] is Peter [Milo Ventimiglia]." so it's not entirely clear to me whether it's really Peter or Sprague who's da bomb... though Peter's definitely hotter

One refreshing attribute of Heroes remains the transparency with which the shows actors and creators relate to fans and the media. From Greg Grunberg's spoilery interview with Michael Ausiello (follow the link and see video links on the right) to Tim Kring sitting down to talk to various news sources, it's clear that the Heroes writers and cast don't mind revealing plot points ahead of the episode's air date. That keeps the fans (the same ones who are snarkily posting that Lost writers have no direction) happy. Hopefully Kring and cast will continue this practice, since, even though I'm not a snarky fan, it makes me happy too!


What we still don't know
The great thing about Heroes so far is that they're wrapping up some mysteries (Six Months Earlier is a good example) while they introduce others (like who was HRG taking his "marching orders" to keep Sylar alive from?). Also falling into the column of "what we don't know" would be why Sylar didn't immediately break out of his holding cell at the Make-Believe Paper Company. Why did he wait until Eden came to kill him? Did self-preservation motivate him to be super-duper powerful or was he just toying with them all along? Also, why does the Haitian want to keep Claire's memories intact? Does he know that the s**t is going to hit the fan in the form of da bomb or is he just tired of being HMG's mind wipe bitch? Needless to say, there are still plenty of mysteries to be unraveled when the show returns on January 22nd.


Minor annoyances
The geneticist in me (yes, the one that loves fruit flies laying eggs on pennies) has trouble buying the premise that based on mutation(s) in the Heroes' DNA Dr. Chandra Suresh is able to track the heroes down geographically. First of all, this sort of tracking would require access to a massive database containing the sequence of every individual in the world's DNA (or at least a sample of it). No such database currently exists, and even if it did, Suresh would have to obtain prior informed consent from the individuals whose DNA he tests in order to test for the presence of the mutation(s). I might add that such prior informed consent would probably be easy to obtain from Sylar who was determined to be different and special but would likely be difficult to obtain from such reluctant heroes as Nathan Petrelli, Claire Bennett and Sylar's first victim (the telekinetic guy who wanted to get rid of his power to avoid hurting anyone - yea, that didn't turn out so well). The whole question of privacy and mining of DNA databases is a huge ethical issue that policy makers both in the U.S. at NIH and through international organizations such as OECD and WHO are wresting with. It might be interesting for Heroes to give Mohinder a plot line where he has to convince some international organization that free and open access to genetic databases is necessary to preserve the world. At any rate, it would give him something to do besides the annoying voiceovers.

Finally, just a quick eulogy for Eden. Nora Zehetner brought Eden (aka Stinkerbell) from a girl who had defined her own morality through mind control, convincing cops to eat doughnuts rather than arrest her to the hero who helped Issac recover from his heroine addiction and who made the ultimate sacrifice by taking her own life so that Sylar could not obtain her power of persuasion. We'll see you in flashbacks, Eden.



Courtesy of Tombstone Generator